Family Court in America

The authors of this blog hope this information will circulate wherever it might be helpful with credit given where credit is due. If the information published on this site somehow changes during in the process of transmission over the internet, we hold ourselves harmless. If the information published here becomes outdated due to the process of family court investigation and reform, we will hold ourselves harmless and we will celebrate!!! Insofar as blogs are subject to human error, we are human. Therefore and wherefore, we accordingly hold ourselves harmless for unintended mistakes, including, but not limited to: inaccurate translations, misinterpretation of content, bad grammar and/or careless punctuation. When using external links, we hope our readers will always be directed to intended sites. If not, please let us know immediately and we'll fix any errors in URLs and domain links as soon as we become aware of such errors. We might or might not recommend, in whole or in part, the automatically generated links occasionally appearing at the end of some posts on this site. We do not wish to offend anyone for any reason and therefore hereby hold ourselves harmless from any harm caused by any content on this blog. The opinions expressed in this blog are not intended to malign any religion, ethnic group, club, organization, company, nor any other person place or thing. The authors of this blog take full responsibility for our own opinions and personal views - all protected by the First Amendment which states: "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances." The opinions of people posting comments on this blog in the United States are also hereby protected by that same glorious First Amendment. With all due respect, concern and regret, the authors of this blog hereby hold ourselves harmless for any content here which may break laws in any country outside of the United States. We are not responsible for our readers' comments under the jurisdiction of governments, religions, and/or any other entity outside the jurisdiction of the United States. The authors of this blog hold ourselves harmless for any and all expressions published here, there and everywhere which are different from, in disaccord with, in protest of, dissenting from, resisting and in disagreement with statements made by any family court representative who has ignored, is now ignoring or will in the future ignore established federal and/or state law. The opinions and advice offered on this blog are opinions and advice, not legal counsel. All contents of this site may be used by anyone with good intentions and not by anyone who still needs to learn how to have good intentions. Since we need laws to govern the world and to prevent total chaos, if any legal action is brought against the authors of this blog in good faith and for any reason, the cap limit for financial responsibility of the authors of this blog is hereby set forth as $.01 to symbolize responsibility for any human error in any form in the creation of this disclaimer and in the creation of this blog. Make it a great day.

From:

The National Alliance for Family Court Justice

The truth about most "troubled" custody cases is that many decisions are made long before the trials ever get started - and sometimes by individuals other than the judge who eventually "hears" the case.

In these kinds of cases, there is little you could have said or done to change this - as many have sensed…

We now know techniques to discover and retroactively attack this illegal collusion which is the real cause of the unfavorable and "biased" court decisions against mothers who try to protect themselves and their children from abusive fathers.

The only way to help your children and yourself is to focus on those involved in your case, with whom they associate and what they have done... and to learn a different style in dealing with these individuals.

DO NOT introduce your story with, "This is what happened to my child and me...". Explaining a series of traumatic events doesn't identify the category of these kinds of cases which involve official collusion.

A long recitation of incidents that are related - but not necessarily in order - is usually how traumatised mothers explain all of the threats, abuse and damage done when trying desperately to protect their children and themselves. This can be very confusing to those who are not involved in the case and often sounds unbelievable to those who are still unaware of the family court crisis.

Remove yourself from your emotions as much as possible and present the facts of the case as if you were someone else explaining a chronological outline of what you have reviewed from a case file.

There are hidden reasons why fathers retaliate with custody litigation when mothers file child abuse or support arrears complaints. There are also hidden reasons why CPS will not investigate child abuse reports - using excuses involving terms such as: "it's a custody battle", "a case with ongoing litigation", "a case of he said / she said" or "a case of parental alienation".

In these types of cases, the "system" deliberately mishandles cases: fathers are coached in retaliatory litigation and "crazy" making so those who are paid for their services can maintain control of lucrative litigation.

In these kinds of cases, those involved in the charade view you as exploitable prey. Posturing yourself as a "helpless" victim only provokes their malicious instincts and makes them feel very successful...and eager to conduct more malicious litigation against you.

This is the reason there are few court professionals who can actually handle these type of cases honestly and effectively. We know of no pro-bono experts who work on these cases. Very few are successful with these cases and those who are successful charge more than most can afford.

Also, some custody/child abuse litigation "experts" who specialize in fighting PAS for protective mothers have a history of acting like swindlers and not professional attorneys. They demand huge retainer fees only to totally ignore their new client after the retainer fee check has cleared their bank. Some of these attorney have had bar complaints filed against them by victimized mothers.

We know of no established women's or child abuse advocacy organization which effectively assists victims in these cases. As many have discovered, the main result from seeking a pro-bono expert is a lot of time lost and an expensive phone bill.

After many years of research, we have found an alternative way to handle these kinds of cases which has proven to be quite effective: Learn to understand the hidden traps in the system. Learn how to document the professional misconduct. Learn to defend yourself from those who are exploiting you and your children for profit.

To network with others who are researching the ways in which federal and state funds are used to "flip" custody from protective mothers to abusive fathers, contact:

Liz Richards, Director
The National Alliance for Family Court Justice

email: LIZGOAL@aol.com